Code402 vs QVeris Agent Toolkit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Code402 and QVeris Agent Toolkit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Code402 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Code402 Details

Choose QVeris Agent Toolkit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore QVeris Agent Toolkit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Code402 Finance & Fintech	QVeris Agent Toolkit Finance & Fintech
Summary	Discover machine-payable APIs, probe x402 payment terms, and run seller operations. Non-custodial.	Discover, inspect and call ranked external data & tool APIs with unified billing and usage audit
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "code402": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "code402"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-202": {
      "url": "https://qveris.ai"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons