Codasms MCP vs Quackr

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codasms MCP and Quackr MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codasms MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codasms MCP Details

Q

Choose Quackr when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get-balance, get-pricing, get-inventory.

Explore Quackr Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codasms MCP Developer Tools	Q Quackr Developer Tools
Summary	Receive one-time SMS/OTP verification codes via the CODASMS API: get a number, wait, release.	Virtual phone numbers for SMS verification, OTP receipt, and number management.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codasms-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "codasms-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quackr": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "quackr-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons