Cocktails vs Domains — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Cocktails vs Domains
In-depth architectural comparison of the Cocktails and Domains MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Cocktails
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Domains
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Cocktails if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Domains if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
C
Choose Cocktails when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Cocktails is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Domains belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Cocktails when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Domains when you require tools for developer tools.