Cms vs Flow2

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cms and Flow2 MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cms when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cms Details

Choose Flow2 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Flow2 Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cms Developer Tools	Flow2 Developer Tools
Summary	Draft, edit, organise, schedule and publish a Writavo Site content from any AI assistant.	Design mobile-first presentations — create, edit, preview, and publish from your AI.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cms-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "cms-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "flow2": {
      "url": "https://modelcontextprotocol.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons