A side-by-side look at the Cloudovňa and Xiyan MCP Server MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Cloudovňa for databases work over a hosted endpoint; choose Xiyan MCP Server for databases as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
C
Choose Cloudovňa when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Xiyan MCP Server tools 1
get_data
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Cloudovňa is categorized under Databases and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Xiyan MCP Server belongs to Databases and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Cloudovňa for databases work and Xiyan MCP Server for databases.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Cloudovňa has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Xiyan MCP Server is listed as free. Auth: api key required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add cloudov-a and xgenerationlab-xiyan-mcp-server as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Cloudovňa has a quality signal of 37/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Xiyan MCP Server has 55/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 239 GitHub stars.