Cloudgate Workflow vs Easypanel MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cloudgate Workflow and Easypanel MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Cloudgate Workflow when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cloudgate Workflow Details

Choose Easypanel MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: EASYPANEL_URL, EASYPANEL_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: 57 typed tools across 15 categories, Automatic detection of three Easypanel API generations, Read-only access mode.

Explore Easypanel MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Cloudgate Workflow Developer Tools	Easypanel MCP Server helbertparanhos Developer Tools
Summary
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloudgate-workflow": {
      "url": "https://api.cloudgate.dev/mcp/workflow"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "helbertparanhos-easypanel-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "easypanel-mcp-server"
      ],
      "env": {
        "EASYPANEL_URL": "YOUR_EASYPANEL_URL_HERE",
        "EASYPANEL_TOKEN": "YOUR_EASYPANEL_TOKEN_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons