Clio MCP vs Progi — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Clio MCP vs Progi
In-depth architectural comparison of the Clio MCP and Progi MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Clio MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Progi
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Clio MCP if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Progi if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
C
Choose Clio MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Opens your browser to Clio's login page and stores your credentials securely
auth_status
Shows whether you are currently authenticated and when your session expires
logout
Clears your stored credentials from this machine
list_matters
Lists matters with optional status filter, including custom field values; returns a paginated envelope with `total_count`, `has_more`, and `next_page_token
get_matter
Returns full detail for a specific matter, including its Maildrop forwarding address and custom field values
create_matter
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Clio MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Progi belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Clio MCP when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Progi when you require tools for developer tools.
Creates a new matter; status defaults to Open, billable defaults to true
update_matter
Updates one or more fields on an existing matter, including its stage and custom field values
list_custom_fields
Lists the account's custom field definitions with their types, and for picklist fields their allowed options. Call this before reading or writing custom fields
create_custom_field
Creates a new custom field definition. Use the returned `id` as `custom_field_id` in `create_matter` / `update_matter` to set its value
list_matter_stages
Lists the account's matter stages (Pre-Suit, Discovery, Settlement and so on) grouped by practice area and in pipeline order. Call this before setting `matter_stage_id`; moving a matter into a stage can trigger the Clio workflows and tasks attached to it
search_contacts
Searches contacts by name, email, or company; returns a paginated envelope with `total_count`, `has_more`, and `next_page_token`; pass the token back to fetch the next page
get_contact
Returns full detail for a specific contact including all emails, phone numbers, addresses, and custom field values
+24 more tools listed on main page
Progi Tools (9)
create_task
Create a new task under a given workflow (status `todo`); returns a preview of its first step
list_tasks
List tasks, optionally filtered by status and/or workflow
start_or_continue_task
Main work-loop entry point — starts or resumes a task and returns the current step's playbook, input data, and output spec
update_progress_notes
Overwrite a task's progress notes (mid-step save point)
finish_step
Mark the current step complete, store its output, and advance to the next step (or mark done)
get_process_skeleton_prompt
Return the Pass 1 system prompt for turning a plain-language description into a structured workflow skeleton
get_playbook_authoring_prompt
Return the Pass 2 system prompt for authoring a step's playbook (injects workflow context)