ClawdCall vs Atlas

In-depth architectural comparison of the ClawdCall and Atlas MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ClawdCall when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ClawdCall Details

Choose Atlas when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Atlas Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ClawdCall Developer Tools	Atlas Developer Tools
Summary	Give AI agents a phone layer for consent-based calls, transcripts, summaries, and outcomes.	Atlas is a YAML-defined semantic layer for analytics — authored by humans, consumed by AI agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "clawdcall": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "clawdcall-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "atlas-2": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@useatlas/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons