ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner vs License Verify MCP

A side-by-side look at the ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner and License Verify MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.

ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner logoClauseKeeper Compliance ScannerLegalScan website legal docs for missing or stale compliance clauses. Rule-based, no LLM.29EmergingAuth: not declaredLicense Verify MCP logoLicense Verify MCPLegal · Local subprocess (stdio)Verify a US contractor's license, surety bond, and insurance from official state data (WA L&I live, CA CSLB beta). Agent-payable pay-per-success, MCP-native.57GoodAuth: no auth required

Verdict: choose ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner for legal work; choose License Verify MCP for legal as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.

Which MCP server should you choose?

ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner logoChoose ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
Explore ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner

License Verify MCP logoChoose License Verify MCP when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
  • You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
  • Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
  • You want tools like jurisdiction, license_number, business_name.
Explore License Verify MCP

Feature & specification comparison

Rows where the two servers differ are marked.

SpecClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner logoClauseKeeper Compliance ScannerLicense Verify MCP logoLicense Verify MCP
CategoryLegalLegal
Quality signal29/100 · Emerging57/100 · Good
Install commandNot confirmed yetConfirmed
Transport—Local subprocess (stdio)
AuthNot declaredNo auth required
PricingNot declaredPaid service
Required env varsNone listedNone listed
Verified ownerCommunity listingCommunity listing
GitHub stars00
Directory activity 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes 5 views 0 installs 0 upvotes
ToolsNot listed3

Tools & capabilities

ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

License Verify MCP tools 3

  • jurisdiction
  • license_number
  • business_name

Ready-to-paste client configs

Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.

ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner

No confirmed install command for ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.

License Verify MCP

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lmaniraruta-license-verify-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "apify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently asked questions

ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner is categorized under Legal and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. License Verify MCP belongs to Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner for legal work and License Verify MCP for legal.

Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client. ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner has no confirmed install command yet — follow its own setup instructions.

ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. License Verify MCP is listed as a paid service. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.

Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add clausekeeper-compliance-scanner and lmaniraruta-license-verify-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.

On AllMCPs, ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner has a quality signal of 29/100 (Emerging) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. License Verify MCP has 57/100 (Good) with 5 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.