ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner vs Legal Data Hunter

In-depth architectural comparison of the ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner and Legal Data Hunter MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner Details

Choose Legal Data Hunter when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Legal Data Hunter Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ClauseKeeper Compliance Scanner Legal	Legal Data Hunter Legal
Summary	Scan website legal docs for missing or stale compliance clauses. Rule-based, no LLM.	Search 18M+ legal documents worldwide — case law, legislation, and doctrine across 110+ countries.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "clausekeeper-compliance-scanner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "clausekeeper-compliance-scanner"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "legal-data-hunter": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "legal-data-hunter"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons