Clash Royale vs Cypress Cloud MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Clash Royale and Cypress Cloud MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Clash Royale when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Clash Royale Details

Choose Cypress Cloud MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cypress Cloud MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Clash Royale Developer Tools	Cypress Cloud MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Clash Royale player, clan, war, tournament, rankings, cards. Supercell dev key.	The Cypress Cloud MCP server brings Cypress test result context directly into your AI workflow.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "clash-royale": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "clash-royale"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cypress-cloud-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons