Clarity by Health AI vs Yade Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Clarity by Health AI and Yade Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Clarity by Health AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Clarity by Health AI Details

Choose Yade Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: yade_browse_api, yade_query_api, yade_execute_code.

Explore Yade Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Clarity by Health AI Research	Yade Mcp yusong652 Research
Summary	Condition-aware ingredient & product safety for AI agents: verdict, evidence tier, citations.	MCP server for YADE — open-source discrete element method (DEM) engine for granular and particle simulation. Browse API docs with BM25 search, execute code via synchronous REPL or async background tasks, monitor progress, and review task history.
Category & Scope	Research

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "clarity-by-health-ai-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "clarity-by-health-ai-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yusong652-yade-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "yade-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons