Clarik MCP Server vs Sticky

In-depth architectural comparison of the Clarik MCP Server and Sticky MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Clarik MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Clarik MCP Server Details

S

Choose Sticky when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sticky Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Clarik MCP Server Knowledge & Memory	S Sticky Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Clarity and memory persistent workspace context manager for Claude.	A board your agent writes to. Persistent memory, capped so context never grows.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "clarik-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "clarik"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sticky": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sticky"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons