Chisel vs Filestash

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
C
Chisel
ckanthony
📂 File Systems
F
Filestash
mickaelkerjean
📂 File Systems
SummaryReduce context usage on file use. Send only unified diffs instead of full files (up to 20-100× fewer tokens), and read large files with targeted grep/sed instead of full reads (up to 500×). Kernel-enforced path confinement hard-locks the agent to a configured root: no accidental reads or writes outside scope. Standalone for your file access or embed in any MCP server (Rust, Node.js, Python via WASM).Remote Storage Access: SFTP, S3, FTP, SMB, NFS, WebDAV, GIT, FTPS, gcloud, azure blob, sharepoint, etc.
Quality signal29/100 (Emerging)19/100 (Emerging)
Install pathuvx · lownpx · low
Engagement 2 0 0 17 1 0 0
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView ChiselView Filestash
More alternatives to ChiselMore alternatives to FilestashFile Systems category

Other servers like Chisel