Cituna MCP vs Submit Map

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cituna MCP and Submit Map MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Cituna MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: whoami, list_brands, get_visibility.

Explore Cituna MCP Details

Choose Submit Map when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_platforms, get_platform, qualify_project.

Explore Submit Map Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Cituna MCP Marketing	Submit Map Marketing
Summary	Track how 6 AI engines cite your brand, daily, with live Google Search Console.	A directory of product launch platforms: where your product qualifies and how each form is filled.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cituna-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "cituna-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "directory-3": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "directory-3"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons