A side-by-side look at the Citeguard and Touch Browser MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Citeguard for research work as a local process; choose Touch Browser for research as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Research | Research |
| Quality signal | 40/100 · Fair | 51/100 · Good |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | Not declared | No auth required |
| Pricing | Not declared | Free |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
{
"mcpServers": {
"citeguard-3": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"citationguard"
]
}
}
}
{
"mcpServers": {
"nangman-infra-touch-browser": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@nangman-infra/touch-browser-mcp"
]
}
}
}
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
|---|
| GitHub stars | 1 | 10 |
|---|
| Directory activity | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 3 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
|---|
| Tools | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Full listing | View Citeguard | View Touch Browser |
|---|