Citedy Seo Agent vs Shhots AI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Citedy Seo Agent and Shhots AI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Citedy Seo Agent when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Freemium).
• You have access to required keys: CITEDY_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: Auto-publish articles and adaptations to LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, YouTube Shorts,…, Deep SEO scanning with AI-powered recommendations, Generate AI illustrations and voice-over narrations for articles.

Explore Citedy Seo Agent Details

S

Choose Shhots AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Paid Service).

Explore Shhots AI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Citedy Seo Agent Citedy Marketing	S Shhots AI Marketing
Summary
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "citedy-citedy-seo-agent": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "openskills"
      ],
      "env": {
        "CITEDY_API_KEY": "YOUR_CITEDY_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shhots-ai": {
      "url": "https://shhots.ai/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons