Citadel MCP vs Context

In-depth architectural comparison of the Citadel MCP and Context MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Citadel MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Citadel MCP Details

Choose Context when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Context Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Citadel MCP Developer Tools	Context Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server bundling per-stack documentation tools for coding agents.	Local-first documentation for AI agents. Offline, instant, private doc retrieval.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "citadel-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "add-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "context-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "context-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons