Cisco SD WAN MCP Server vs Omni Scanner

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cisco SD WAN MCP Server and Omni Scanner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cisco SD WAN MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cisco SD WAN MCP Server Details

Choose Omni Scanner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Omni Scanner Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cisco SD WAN MCP Server Developer Tools	Omni Scanner Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN (vManage): fabric inventory, device health, alarms, policies.	Codebase observatory with 56+ scanners for git health, architecture, and documentation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cisco-sd-wan-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "cisco-sdwan-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "omni-scanner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons