CIGAM vs Microvix

In-depth architectural comparison of the CIGAM and Microvix MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose CIGAM when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CIGAM Details

Choose Microvix when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Microvix Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	CIGAM Developer Tools	Microvix Developer Tools
Summary	CIGAM ERP (management for industry, retail and franchises) via session capture with your authorizati	Microvix retail ERP (Linx, part of the Stone group) for store chains and franchises, via the officia
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cigam": {
      "url": "https://claude.ai/new?modal=add-custom-connector#settings/customize-connectors"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "microvix": {
      "url": "https://claude.ai/customize/connectors?modal=add-custom-connector&mcpName=Microvix&mcpServerUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.mcp.ai%2Fp_microvix"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons