Buyer-side SaaS due-diligence maths: NRR, GRR, revenue concentration, zombie MRR, LTV:CAC.
Copy the AI prompt to install this server into Claude Code, Cursor, or another agent β or use 1-click editor setup below.
We haven't yet run this listing's install command through our automated sandbox check. This isn't a red flag β we're steadily working through the catalog.
π‘ Paste the JSON block into your client's configuration file under mcpServers, then restart the application.
Buyer-side SaaS due-diligence maths for AI agents. Net and gross revenue retention, revenue concentration risk, dormant ("zombie") MRR, LTV:CAC and a composite health score β computed from figures you supply.
Live endpoint: https://churnlens.site/api/mcp β streamable HTTP, MCP
protocol 2024-11-05. No authentication, no account, no rate limit, and
nothing you send is stored.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or any client that speaks stdio:
By config:
A GET on the endpoint returns the manifest. The machine-readable descriptor
is at /.well-known/mcp.json.
| Tool | What it returns |
|---|---|
calculate_churn_rate | NRR, GRR, revenue churn, correctly compounded annualised churn, and the NRRβGRR spread that exposes churn masked by expansion |
analyze_revenue_concentration | Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, top-N revenue share, and which customers are large enough that losing one is a balance-sheet event |
detect_zombie_mrr | Accounts still paying but dormant past a threshold, and the ARR at risk behind them |
score_saas_health | Composite 0β100 across retention, growth, concentration, efficiency and durability, plus the weakest dimension |
calculate_ltv | Gross-margin-adjusted lifetime value, LTV:CAC and CAC payback in months |
get_scoring_bands | Every threshold the tools apply, with its provenance |
Every tool returns structuredContent alongside the text block, so an agent
gets typed numbers rather than prose it has to parse back out.
A business reporting 115% net revenue retention sounds excellent. The same business at 78% gross revenue retention is losing nearly a quarter of its revenue base a year and covering the hole with upsell. Most dashboards show the first number and not the second.
get_scoring_bands returns thresholds, not measured data. They are
informed by published industry benchmarks β SaaS Capital, Benchmarkit, Recurly
and FE International β cited with sources at
churnlens.site/benchmarks. Segment matters
enormously: median retention for enterprise infrastructure and for SMB
self-serve are not the same number. Do not present a band as though it were a
survey result.
These tools compute from summary figures you supply. They cannot see what only emerges from customer-level data β cohort decay curves, renewal-cliff timing, concentration in specific logos. Treat them as a first-pass screen.
The same calculations are open source under MIT at kindrat86/saas-metrics β zero dependencies, every scoring band documented, 27 tests. A result from this server can be reproduced independently.
Interactive versions for humans, no signup: churnlens.site/free.
ChurnLens is a buyer-side SaaS due-diligence tool for acquirers, private-equity firms and M&A analysts.
Unaffiliated with the similarly named churnlens.io (retention automation) or churnlens.tech (churn prediction).
MIT licensed. Free.
No reviews yet β be the first to share how this listing worked for you.
Showcase your server listing on GitHub or your project documentation. Embed this dynamic SVG badge to highlight official listing status and live engagement.
[](https://allmcps.com/mcp/churnlens-2)<a href="https://allmcps.com/mcp/churnlens-2"><img src="https://allmcps.com/api/badge/churnlens-2?style=directory" alt="ChurnLens on AllMCPs" /></a>