What is the key difference between Churnkey and Superlog?

Churnkey belongs to the Monitoring category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Superlog belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Churnkey or Superlog in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Churnkey and Superlog free or paid?

Churnkey operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Superlog operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Churnkey lists 0 tools with 0 views and 22 GitHub stars. Superlog lists 0 tools with 0 views and 1,442 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Churnkey and Superlog together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Churnkey vs Superlog

In-depth architectural comparison of the Churnkey and Superlog MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Churnkey

Monitoring · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Superlog

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Churnkey if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Superlog if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Churnkey when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Churnkey Details

Choose Superlog when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Superlog Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Churnkey Monitoring	S Superlog Monitoring
Summary	Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery	Open-source agent that observes and fixes your application. Query logs, traces, metrics, incidents.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Churnkey Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Superlog Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Churnkey Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "churnkey": {
      "url": "https://churnkey.co"
    }
  }
}

Superlog Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "superlog": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Churnkey is categorized under Monitoring and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Superlog belongs to Monitoring using local stdio subprocess. Select Churnkey when you need capabilities focused on monitoring and Superlog when you require tools for monitoring.

More alternatives to Churnkey More alternatives to Superlog Monitoring category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Churnkey

Popular comparisons with Superlog

Superlog vs Netdata