Chronary MCP vs NoClick

In-depth architectural comparison of the Chronary MCP and NoClick MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Chronary MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: delete_calendar, delete_agent, get_calendar_context.

Explore Chronary MCP Details

N

Choose NoClick when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore NoClick Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Chronary MCP Chronary Workplace & Productivity	N NoClick Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Calendar API built for AI agents — 47 tools for events, availability, meeting-time search, scheduling proposals, availability rules, webhooks, and iCal feeds. Local via npx -y @chronary/mcp or hosted at https://api.chronary.ai/mcp.	Build agents to automate any background task. Works with your ChatGPT/Claude subscription.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chronary-chronary-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "noclick": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "noclick"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons