What is the key difference between Chromeflow and Godotiq?

Chromeflow belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Godotiq belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Chromeflow or Godotiq in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Chromeflow and Godotiq free or paid?

Chromeflow operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Godotiq operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Chromeflow lists 0 tools with 2 views and 2 GitHub stars. Godotiq lists 0 tools with 0 views and 54 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Chromeflow and Godotiq together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Chromeflow vs Godotiq

In-depth architectural comparison of the Chromeflow and Godotiq MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Chromeflow

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Godotiq

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Chromeflow if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Godotiq if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Chromeflow when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Chromeflow Details

Choose Godotiq when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Godotiq Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Chromeflow Developer Tools	G Godotiq Developer Tools
Summary	Lets Claude Code or Codex CLI drive your real Chrome — sessions intact, 26 browser tools.	Intelligent MCP server for Godot 4. Spatial intelligence, code analysis, 35 tools.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Chromeflow Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Godotiq Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Chromeflow Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chromeflow": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "chromeflow"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Godotiq Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "godotiq": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "godotiq"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Chromeflow is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Godotiq belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Chromeflow when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Godotiq when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Chromeflow More alternatives to Godotiq Developer Tools category hub