Chipp vs Cloudgate Workflow

In-depth architectural comparison of the Chipp and Cloudgate Workflow MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Chipp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Chipp Details

Choose Cloudgate Workflow when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cloudgate Workflow Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Chipp Developer Tools	Cloudgate Workflow Developer Tools
Summary	Build and manage Chipp AI apps: prompts, knowledge, custom actions, and chat with your apps.	Build and manage Cloudgate workflow-APIs: controllers, actions, workflow graphs, and databases.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chipp": {
      "url": "https://chipp.ai/docs/guides/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloudgate-workflow": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://api.cloudgate.dev/mcp/workflow"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons