Chess.com MCP Server vs Suigar TypeScript SDKs

In-depth architectural comparison of the Chess.com MCP Server and Suigar TypeScript SDKs MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Chess.com MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Chess.com MCP Server Details

Choose Suigar TypeScript SDKs when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Suigar TypeScript SDKs Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Chess.com MCP Server Gaming	Suigar TypeScript SDKs Gaming
Summary	MCP server for Chess.com player profiles, games, stats, puzzles, clubs, and tournaments	MCP server and MCP App for building and inspecting Suigar transactions on Sui.
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chess-com-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "chess-com-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-206": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@suigar/mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons