Basescope vs Taskbounty Check

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
B
Basescope
chasdaddy
🔒 Security
Taskbounty Check
eliottreich
🔒 Security
SummaryThe read-only safety layer for onchain AI agents. 13 read-only tools on Base + EVM: token/contract safety (honeypot & rug-pull checks cross-referenced across GoPlus + honeypot.is), risky-approval detection, verified-source lookup, balances, ENS + Basenames, gas, and prices. No private keys, no required API keys. npx -y basescopeLocal-only GitHub Actions and CI maintenance scanner for AI-built apps. Exposes scanrepo, explainfinding, and generatefixplan to MCP clients; reads only allowlisted workflow and update configuration, modifies nothing, makes no outbound requests by default, and has zero runtime dependencies. Run with npx -y taskbounty-check@0.1.6 mcp.
Quality signal24/100 (Emerging)24/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · high
Engagement 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView BasescopeView Taskbounty Check
More alternatives to BasescopeMore alternatives to Taskbounty CheckSecurity category

Other servers like Basescope