Basescope vs Nobulex

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
B
Basescope
chasdaddy
🔒 Security
N
Nobulex
arian-gogani
🔒 Security
SummaryThe read-only safety layer for onchain AI agents. 13 read-only tools on Base + EVM: token/contract safety (honeypot & rug-pull checks cross-referenced across GoPlus + honeypot.is), risky-approval detection, verified-source lookup, balances, ENS + Basenames, gas, and prices. No private keys, no required API keys. npx -y basescopeProof-of-behavior enforcement for AI agents. Define behavioral covenant rules (permit/forbid/require), enforce at runtime before execution, get SHA-256 hash-chained tamper-evident audit logs, and verify compliance independently. Cross-agent verification handshake — no proof, no transaction. MIT licensed, 4,244 tests.
Quality signal24/100 (Emerging)28/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · low
Engagement 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 38
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView BasescopeView Nobulex
More alternatives to BasescopeMore alternatives to NobulexSecurity categoryCanonical compare URL

Other servers like Basescope