Chainstack vs Hive Credit Broker

In-depth architectural comparison of the Chainstack and Hive Credit Broker MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Chainstack when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_docs, get_doc_page, get_platform_status.

Explore Chainstack Details

H

Choose Hive Credit Broker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: credit.markets, credit.quote, credit.today.

Explore Hive Credit Broker Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Chainstack Developer Tools	H Hive Credit Broker Developer Tools
Summary	Deploy and manage blockchain nodes across 70+ protocols, search docs, request testnet funds.	Broker-only credit/lending discovery shim for AI agents
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chainstack": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hive-credit-broker": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hive-credit-broker"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons