Telegram MCP vs Personal WhatsApp MCP for Claude, built directly on whatsmeow
In-depth architectural comparison of the Telegram MCP and Personal WhatsApp MCP for Claude, built directly on whatsmeow MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Telegram MCP
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Personal WhatsApp MCP for Claude, built directly on whatsmeow
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Telegram MCP if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose Personal WhatsApp MCP for Claude, built directly on whatsmeow if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Telegram MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: TG_APP_ID, TG_API_HASH.
Primary tools included: Get current user account info, List dialogs with optional unread filter, Retrieve messages from dialogs.
Telegram MCP is categorized under Communication and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Personal WhatsApp MCP for Claude, built directly on whatsmeow belongs to Communication using local stdio subprocess. Select Telegram MCP when you need capabilities focused on communication and Personal WhatsApp MCP for Claude, built directly on whatsmeow when you require tools for communication.