Telegram MCP vs Multi Workspace Slack MCP server with draft+confirm safety, vault auto Export, a
In-depth architectural comparison of the Telegram MCP and Multi Workspace Slack MCP server with draft+confirm safety, vault auto Export, a MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Telegram MCP
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Multi Workspace Slack MCP server with draft+confirm safety, vault auto Export, a
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 33/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Telegram MCP if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose Multi Workspace Slack MCP server with draft+confirm safety, vault auto Export, a if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Telegram MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: TG_APP_ID, TG_API_HASH.
Primary tools included: Get current user account info, List dialogs with optional unread filter, Retrieve messages from dialogs.
Telegram MCP is categorized under Communication and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Multi Workspace Slack MCP server with draft+confirm safety, vault auto Export, a belongs to Communication using local stdio subprocess. Select Telegram MCP when you need capabilities focused on communication and Multi Workspace Slack MCP server with draft+confirm safety, vault auto Export, a when you require tools for communication.