Cg Agent Kit vs WebAnatomy

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cg Agent Kit and WebAnatomy MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cg Agent Kit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: cg_check, cg_generate_verilog, cg_simulate.

Explore Cg Agent Kit Details

Choose WebAnatomy when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore WebAnatomy Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cg Agent Kit Developer Tools	WebAnatomy Developer Tools
Summary
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cg-agent-kit": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "cg-agent-kit"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "webanatomy": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons