Census (ACS by ZIP) vs Obsify

In-depth architectural comparison of the Census (ACS by ZIP) and Obsify MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Census (ACS by ZIP) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Census (ACS by ZIP) Details

Choose Obsify when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Obsify Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Census (ACS by ZIP) Developer Tools	Obsify Developer Tools
Summary	U.S. Census (ACS) data by ZIP: income, demographics, housing, education, from a local store.	Local, privacy-preserving PII toolkit over MCP — shape to the model, substance stays local.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "census-acs-by-zip": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcpwright-census"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "obsify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons