CE RISE Digital Passport Engineering Assistant vs Magic MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the CE RISE Digital Passport Engineering Assistant and Magic MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
CE RISE Digital Passport Engineering Assistant
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Magic MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose CE RISE Digital Passport Engineering Assistant if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Magic MCP if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose CE RISE Digital Passport Engineering Assistant when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
CE RISE Digital Passport Engineering Assistant is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Magic MCP belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select CE RISE Digital Passport Engineering Assistant when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Magic MCP when you require tools for developer tools.
