Cdt Express MCP vs ProjectPulse MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cdt Express MCP and ProjectPulse MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Cdt Express MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cdt Express MCP Details

Choose ProjectPulse MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ProjectPulse MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Cdt Express MCP Monitoring	ProjectPulse MCP Monitoring
Summary	Interact with climate metrics via Riskthinking.AI's CDT Express API in supported AI chat experiences	Monitor GitHub repo health, DORA metrics and CI signals from your AI assistant.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cdt-express-mcp": {
      "url": "https://mcp.riskthinking.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "projectpulse-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "projectpulse-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons