Cdpilot vs Playwright Trace Decoder MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cdpilot and Playwright Trace Decoder MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cdpilot when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cdpilot Details

Choose Playwright Trace Decoder MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Playwright Trace Decoder MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cdpilot Browser Automation	Playwright Trace Decoder MCP Browser Automation
Summary	Zero-dependency browser automation over raw CDP — no Puppeteer, Playwright, or Selenium.	MCP server for unpacking and analyzing Playwright trace.zip archives
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cdpilot": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "cdpilot"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "playwright-trace-decoder-mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.example.com/cart/items"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons