CCXT vs Paradex Trading

In-depth architectural comparison of the CCXT and Paradex Trading MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose CCXT when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CCXT Details

P

Choose Paradex Trading when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: paradex_system_config, paradex_system_state, paradex_markets.

Explore Paradex Trading Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	CCXT Developer Tools	P Paradex Trading Developer Tools
Summary
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ccxt": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "paradex-trading": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-paradex"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons