Catalog vs Hypawave MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Catalog and Hypawave MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Catalog when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_mfo, get_mfo, search_offers.

Explore Catalog Details

Choose Hypawave MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_offers, get_offer, buy_offer.

Explore Hypawave MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Catalog Developer Tools	Hypawave MCP hypawave Developer Tools
Summary	Read-only catalog of licensed Kazakhstan MFOs: microloan terms, ARDFM licenses, ratings and reviews.	Agent-to-agent Lightning commerce: buy, sell & discover files, data, APIs & compute. Non-custodial.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "catalog-12": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-299": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@hypawave/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons