CAST Imaging MCP Server vs MCP Server Docker

In-depth architectural comparison of the CAST Imaging MCP Server and MCP Server Docker MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose CAST Imaging MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: applications, all_applications, my_applications.

Explore CAST Imaging MCP Server Details

Choose MCP Server Docker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: DOCKER_HOST.
• Primary tools included: Natural-language container composition prompt, Container lifecycle management, Image build, pull, push, and removal.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	CAST Imaging MCP Server Developer Tools	MCP Server Docker ckreiling Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server exposing CAST Imaging software architecture insights to AI agents	Integrate with Docker to manage containers, images, volumes, and networks.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cast-imaging-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "cast-imaging-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ckreiling-mcp-server-docker": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-server-docker"
      ],
      "env": {
        "DOCKER_HOST": "YOUR_DOCKER_HOST_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons