Engram MCP vs Deja Vu

In-depth architectural comparison of the Engram MCP and Deja Vu MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Engram MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: ENGRAM_DB, ENGRAM_EMBEDDING_URL.
• Primary tools included: remember, recall, search.

Explore Engram MCP Details

Choose Deja Vu when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: recall, recall_context, blame.

Explore Deja Vu Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Engram MCP Cartisien Knowledge & Memory	Deja Vu vshulcz Knowledge & Memory
Summary
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cartisien-engram-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@cartisien/engram-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "ENGRAM_DB": "YOUR_ENGRAM_DB_HERE",
        "ENGRAM_EMBEDDING_URL": "YOUR_ENGRAM_EMBEDDING_URL_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vshulcz-deja-vu": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vshulcz/deja-vu"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons