Captain Legal vs Ris MCP Ts

In-depth architectural comparison of the Captain Legal and Ris MCP Ts MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Captain Legal when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Captain Legal Details

Choose Ris MCP Ts when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: ris_bundesrecht, ris_landesrecht, ris_judikatur.

Explore Ris MCP Ts Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Captain Legal Legal	Ris MCP Ts philrox Legal
Summary	Compliant legal documents from your AI assistant: 1,100+ templates, 15 countries, free preview.	Access Austrian federal laws, state laws, court decisions, and legal documents via the RIS (Rechtsinformationssystem) API with 12 specialized tools.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "captain-legal": {
      "url": "https://mcp.captain.legal/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "philrox-ris-mcp-ts": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ris-mcp-ts"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons