CAPI Gateway vs Spotifyscraper

In-depth architectural comparison of the CAPI Gateway and Spotifyscraper MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose CAPI Gateway when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CAPI Gateway Details

Choose Spotifyscraper when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Spotifyscraper Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C CAPI Gateway Developer Tools	Spotifyscraper Developer Tools
Summary	Apache Camel API Gateway with REST-to-MCP bridging for LLM agents.	Public Spotify metadata, lyrics and podcasts for LLM agents. No API key, read-only.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "capi-gateway": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "capi-gateway"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spotifyscraper": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "spotifyscraper"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons