Wenyan MCP vs Hook Detector

In-depth architectural comparison of the Wenyan MCP and Hook Detector MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Wenyan MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: WECHAT_APP_ID, WECHAT_APP_SECRET.
• Primary tools included: Markdown-to-WeChat rich-text rendering, Built-in and custom formatting themes, Local and remote image uploads.

Explore Wenyan MCP Details

H

Choose Hook Detector when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hook Detector Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Wenyan MCP caol64 Social Media	H Hook Detector Social Media
Summary	Wenyan MCP Server, which lets AI automatically format Markdown articles and publish them to WeChat GZH.	Real TikTok and Instagram hooks that already work, in any language, with why each travelled.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "caol64-wenyan-mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.example.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hook-detector": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hook-detector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons