California Bitcoin vs Coinvoyage

In-depth architectural comparison of the California Bitcoin and Coinvoyage MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose California Bitcoin when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore California Bitcoin Details

Choose Coinvoyage when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Coinvoyage Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C California Bitcoin Finance & Fintech	Coinvoyage Finance & Fintech
Summary
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "california-bitcoin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "california-bitcoin"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "coinvoyage": {
      "url": "https://api.coinvoyage.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons