Calendly MCP Server vs MCP Kibela Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Calendly MCP Server and MCP Kibela Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Calendly MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_upcoming_events, get_event_details, search_events.

Explore Calendly MCP Server Details

Choose MCP Kibela Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: KIBELA_TEAM, KIBELA_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: query, coediting, isArchived.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Calendly MCP Server Workplace & Productivity	MCP Kibela Server kiwamizamurai Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Connect Claude to Calendly — schedule meetings, check availability, manage events	MCP server implementation for Kibela API integration
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "calendly-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "calendly-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kiwamizamurai-mcp-kibela-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@kiwamizamurai/mcp-kibela-server"
      ],
      "env": {
        "KIBELA_TEAM": "YOUR_KIBELA_TEAM_HERE",
        "KIBELA_TOKEN": "YOUR_KIBELA_TOKEN_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons