Calendar.app vs Mockmcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Calendar.app and Mockmcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Calendar.app when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_calendars, list_events, get_event.

Explore Calendar.app Details

Choose Mockmcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_users, get_user, create_user.

Explore Mockmcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Calendar.app Developer Tools	Mockmcp Developer Tools
Summary	List, search, and manage calendar events via macOS Calendar.app across all configured accounts.	Hosted MCP endpoint with realistic fake data for prototyping agents. 12 tools, no setup.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "calendar-app": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@p-l-ta/calendar-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mockmcp": {
      "url": "https://mockmcp.io)**"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons