Cadastro PF Plus vs Cadastro PF Básico

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cadastro PF Plus and Cadastro PF Básico MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Cadastro PF Plus when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cadastro PF Plus Details

Choose Cadastro PF Básico when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cadastro PF Básico Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Cadastro PF Plus Developer Tools	Cadastro PF Básico Developer Tools
Summary	Extended registration data for an individual from a CPF, beyond the basics. Platform-hosted, no cred	Basic registration data for an individual from a CPF: name, registration status, and date of birth.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cadastro-pf-plus": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "cadastro-pf-plus"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cadastro-pf-b-sico": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "cadastro-pf-b-sico"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons