What is the key difference between C64 Bridge and Telnyx?

C64 Bridge belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Telnyx belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install C64 Bridge or Telnyx in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are C64 Bridge and Telnyx free or paid?

C64 Bridge operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Telnyx operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

C64 Bridge lists 0 tools with 0 views and 34 GitHub stars. Telnyx lists 0 tools with 0 views and 197 GitHub stars.

Can I use both C64 Bridge and Telnyx together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

C64 Bridge vs Telnyx

In-depth architectural comparison of the C64 Bridge and Telnyx MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

C64 Bridge

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Telnyx

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose C64 Bridge if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Telnyx if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose C64 Bridge when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore C64 Bridge Details

Choose Telnyx when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Telnyx Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C64 Bridge Developer Tools	T Telnyx Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Commodore 64 Ultimate hardware and VICE emulator control.	Official TypeScript library for the Telnyx API
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

C64 Bridge Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Telnyx Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

C64 Bridge Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "c64-bridge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "c64bridge@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Telnyx Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "telnyx-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "telnyx-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

C64 Bridge is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Telnyx belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select C64 Bridge when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Telnyx when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to C64 Bridge More alternatives to Telnyx Developer Tools category hub