Busymate DevTools vs Currents Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Busymate DevTools and Currents Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Busymate DevTools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Busymate DevTools Details

Choose Currents Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: CURRENTS_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: currents-list-actions, currents-create-action, currents-get-action.

Explore Currents Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Busymate DevTools Browser Automation	Currents Mcp currents-dev Browser Automation
Summary	Capture, inspect & debug HTTPS traffic across iOS, Android, browsers & backends — 304 MCP tools.	Enable AI Agents to fix Playwright test failures reported to Currents.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "busymate-devtools": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "busymate-devtools"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "currents-dev-currents-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@currents/mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "CURRENTS_API_KEY": "YOUR_CURRENTS_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons