Busabase vs NOT FOR HUMANS

In-depth architectural comparison of the Busabase and NOT FOR HUMANS MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Busabase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Busabase Details

Choose NOT FOR HUMANS when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore NOT FOR HUMANS Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Busabase Developer Tools	NOT FOR HUMANS Developer Tools
Summary	Approval-first knowledge base for AI agents. Agents propose, humans review, approved changes merge.	Public NFH knowledge, ownership epochs, versioned learning, Odd Jobs, and unsigned preparation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "busabase": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "not-for-humans": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "not-for-humans"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons